Syngenta Thrive

by

Corn and soybean yield results show NK® hybrids consistently performed under varied pest pressure — from corn rootworm to tar spot — and under extreme conditions, including damaging winds and drought. In particular, the new NK Field Forged Series™ products demonstrated their worth in field trials by consistently topping competitor products.

As yield-robbing problems pervaded cornfields this season, top-of-the-line NK corn genetics demonstrated resilience. NK hybrids were particularly successful against tar spot.

Check out corn yield results near you at nkseeds.com/cornresults. For soybean results, go to nkseeds.com/soyresults.

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Cover image: Matt Dolch (left), Syngenta district manager for the western Corn Belt and NK retail channel, and Mike Egger (right), master seed adviser at Central Valley Ag Cooperative in York, Nebraska, work together to provide seed options to fit grower needs. Photography by Syngenta. 

by

Just as geographic information system (GIS) technology transformed planting and harvesting, advancements in DNA-driven seed production are revolutionizing seed choices. For wheat growers, predictive breeding using DNA is getting new seed varieties to market faster and is on a path to increasing end-user specificity and on-farm profit opportunity.

According to Paul Morano, head of North American cereals for Syngenta, using DNA markers to confirm traits in existing wheat strains eliminates multiple generations of hit-and-miss field trials that were the norm.

“Today, we can look at 100 wheat tissue samples and find the ones that have the DNA string we want,” he says. “We know for a fact it’s in there.”

From there, confirming that the trait was picked up when the cross was made simply requires a DNA test.

“So, there’s a huge difference in the number of plants, the number of trials and the amount of labor you need,” Morano says. “It’s much, much better than the way we were doing it before.”

''

Today, we can look at 100 wheat tissue samples and find the ones that have the DNA string we want.

Paul Morano Head of North American Cereals
at Syngenta

Although technology such as CRISPR — clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats — further reduce the timeline by allowing scientists to manipulate the plant’s DNA in a lab versus in a field, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) currently prohibits genetic modification of wheat through a non-natural process. Genomic editing is often defined as changes made within a plant’s own DNA, with genetic modification defined as the insertion of a gene.

“That’s where the crux of gene editing comes in, because there is no genetically modified wheat; GM wheat is not accepted,” Morano says, adding that even the definition of genetic modification is a gray area. Some interpret it as the insertion of genes from one species into another, while others apply the term to any artificial movement of genes, even same-species transfers.

The Search for Consumer Acceptance

That’s a frustration for Dave Milligan, Michigan farmer and president of the National Association of Wheat Growers.

“Wheat’s kind of fallen behind some of the other crops as far as the technology other crops have used,” he says. “Consumers are resistant to products produced by genetic modification, and it’s really been detrimental to moving wheat research ahead, wheat breeding particularly.”

Milligan hopes the precision of CRISPR will result in wider acceptance of the technology, and he appreciates the gains being made in that arena.

“We’re growing a lot more bushels on a lot fewer acres than we were 50 years ago,” he says. “They have made improvements, and we need to continue to do that.”

Morano says Syngenta continually breeds for increasing yield and disease resistance, but those aren’t the only goals in the breeding program. Breeders also test for consistent performance under a variety of conditions and increased flour quality. They also research gluten properties to improve digestibility.

“Growers want yield, but I think another thing they want is consistency,” he says. “Wheat is grown on some tough acres, and in many places, you can grow a good crop if conditions are right; but when conditions change, your crop goes bad in a hurry. So, farmers want — need — consistent performance.”

Another focus in breeding is finding DNA markers for wheat quality attributes that will improve, and perhaps define, the final flour product.

“That’s important, because then you can breed for a specific end use, whether that’s a bread, a cracker or a cookie,” Morano says. “So that’s one thing a lot of people are working on.”

Another is gluten, the substance that provides the viscoelastic properties that give rise to bread but can also cause problems for those with celiac disease. Allan Fritz, Ph.D., a professor of wheat breeding at Kansas State University, says while a celiac-safe wheat may not be possible, identifying problematic proteins in gluten is a realistic target.

“As a research community, we could look at whether we can make that gluten less reactive in the digestive system so people are less likely to develop sensitivities,” he says.

Wild Relatives’ Promise

Breeders are exploring the vast resource of “wild relatives” — naturally occurring wheat species — to improve commercial varieties. Fritz notes that these wild relatives give breeders access to unique genetics that are not currently available in commercial varieties.

“Only a handful of those plants were involved in the hybridizations that led to modern-day wheat,” he says.

Researchers, including Fritz and the team at the USDA’s Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Center in Manhattan, Kansas, are exploring what the wild species of wheat can contribute to commercial production goals for wheat varieties.

The research already shows that wild relatives can contribute disease and insect resistance, as well as nutritional traits that would make a healthier crop. One of the most promising, Fritz says, is wild emmer, an ancient grain native to Israel that shares 28 of domestic wheat’s 42 chromosomes.

“If we could redomesticate these plants, we could give people something that is actually better for them — better antioxidant capacity, or better iron and zinc nutrition, which is needed in some parts of the world,” Fritz says. “I think there’s a story there, about this natural goodness in the grain we’re providing through these new materials. If we can make things that really are better for people from a health standpoint, there’s a tremendous amount of value in that.”

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Cover image: Emmer wheat, an ancient grain native to Israel, holds promise for wheat breeding because more than half of its chromosomes are the same as those of domestic wheat. Photography by Syngenta. 

by

As an 8-year-old, first-year 4-H member, Austin Walter of Grand Ridge, Illinois, entered a county essay contest. He won a heifer.

“We raised crops and ran a feedlot, so I thought we had cows,” he says. “I had no idea raising a heifer was completely different than finishing steers.”

That’s when Austin’s grandpa, Ralph Walter, stepped in. Ralph raised shorthorns early in his farming career. He switched his livestock business to a feedlot in the 1970s. But he retained his knowledge of raising heifers and passed it on to his eager-to-learn grandson. It was a win for both.

After graduating from Texas Tech University, Austin chose to return home to continue the family tradition of farming. Now a fifth-generation farmer, Austin raises Angus and Simmental show cattle with his younger brother, Dalton, in addition to growing corn and soybeans and running the feedlot with his dad, Darren, and grandpa.

Last spring, Austin wrote an essay for the 2021 #RootedinAg Contest, honoring his grandpa ag mentor. And, once again, they both won.

“Austin’s #RootedinAg entry, like so many, speaks to the tremendous dedication of our farmers who successfully manage strong operations and take the time to ensure the tradition continues in a way that delivers value to their families and supports a strong U.S. ag industry,” says Pam Caraway, marketing communications lead at Syngenta.

Austin says his grandpa spent years teaching him to properly raise, feed and care for cattle, inspiring him to build a life and career in agriculture. “I’m blessed to be able to work alongside Grandpa,” he says. “He’s the anchor of our farm. He still wants to be out here all the time.”

Ralph describes his grandson as an astute perfectionist who practically lived with his calves. “I told him to make sure they always had water and enough feed,” he says. “In the show ring, he learned to treat his competitors as he would want to be treated.”

''

I’m blessed to be able to work alongside Grandpa. He’s the anchor of our farm. He still wants to be out here all the time.

Austin Walter 2021 #RootedinAg Contest Winner

The #RootedinAg prize from Syngenta allows Austin to donate $1,000 to a local charitable or civic organization in his grandpa’s name. He chose to pass on his family’s passion and commitment by supporting agricultural education for Grand Ridge Grade School, including the new Grand Ridge Junior High FFA program.

The donation will support science and agriculture activities, according to Grand Ridge Grade School Superintendent Ted Sanders. “Agriculture is the heart of our community,” Sanders says. “The Walter donation will help start our FFA program for sixth to eighth graders and extend the Illinois Agriculture in the Classroom Program. We are very grateful for this help.”

The other finalists for the 2021 #RootedinAg Contest were farmers Craig Converse of Brookings, South Dakota, and Natalie Doelman of West Lafayette, Indiana. Each vote cast online represents a tough decision, Caraway says.

“I’m thankful for all the online voters who help us decide the #RootedinAg program winner each year,” Caraway says. “We receive submissions filled with uplifting testimonies about the people who give their time and expertise to the next generation of ag leaders.”

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

by

As insects and plants evolve, they sometimes develop resistance to active ingredients in commonly used pesticides. To combat resistance issues, the United Soybean Board launched Take Action (iwilltakeaction.com).

“Our goal in providing recommendations and facilitating discussions through the Take Action platform is to create awareness of sustainable integrated pest management strategies that reduce over-reliance on pesticides and protect the effectiveness and value of available products,” says Emmanuel Byamukama, Ph.D., associate professor and South Dakota State University Extension plant pathologist.

Syngenta is among the industry stakeholders that support Take Action.

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

by

Transforming farms, exceeding client expectations and improving long-term sustainability drive Kyle Walker to amplify the true potential of each farm he manages. Walker began working in asset management in 2006. He has been with Peoples Company in Indianola, Iowa, since 2014, focused on large assets and growing divisions.

''

He’s just got that multitalented ability to relate to a lot of different people, and people take him seriously.

Steve Bruere President, Peoples Company

“He’s just got that multitalented ability to relate to a lot of different people, and people take him seriously,” says Steve Bruere, president of Peoples Company. “It’s been interesting to see Kyle evolve from that farm management role — and broaden his skill set to work across a number of geographies and really become a leader.”

Walker wants to leave a legacy of trustworthiness, knowing that at the end of the day, he did the right thing. “Winning this award and being honored by my peers mean the world to me,” Walker says. “It makes all the long nights and early mornings worth it.”

To learn more about Walker and the Professional Farm Manager of the Year Award, visit www.farmmanageroftheyear.com.

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

by

Most researchers whose life’s work is addressing the prevalence and impact of plant viruses say they aren’t a new agricultural problem. But viruses evolve and adapt rapidly, posing a challenge that’s intensifying over time — intensifying as in causing $60 billion in crop losses worldwide, according to a 2019 estimate.1 Pre-pandemic, we might have referred to this growing threat as “going viral” — after all, we are talking about viruses. Since this feels like a good time to retire that phrase, let’s instead say we have a problem with microorganisms going macro.

It’s an impact that can devastate a field. For instance, the Soybean Research & Information Initiative reports:2

  • Yield losses of nearly 52% in southern germplasm due to bean pod mottle virus (BPMV)
  • Losses from soybean mosaic virus (SMV) as high as 94%.
  • Complete yield loss in many cases when both BPMV and SMV infect soybeans, because symptoms are more severe than those either virus produces alone

The double whammy of BPMV and SMV is one instance of a phenomenon known as viral synergism.

Viral synergism and climate change are among the factors contributing to the prevalence and severity of viral disease, according to associate professor and South Dakota State University Extension plant pathologist Emmanuel Byamukama, Ph.D.

“Viral synergism, when multiple species are playing tag team in an infected plant, has been observed more frequently and can result in increased accumulation of one or more viruses, causing more severe symptoms than if only one was present,” Byamukama says.

In regard to climate change, he says, warmer temperatures for longer periods of time extend the reproduction period and life span of insect vectors, allowing more opportunity for virus transmission.

Taking a Multidisciplinary Approach

Kiran Shetty, Ph.D., Syngenta technical development lead for potatoes, points out that viruses continually evolve. Through mutation, recombination and genetic material changes, viruses reorganize and adapt.

For instance, the number of Potato Virus Y (PVY) strains detected in U.S. potato fields has increased substantially. “Before the 2000s, we only had one strain of PVY impacting commercial potato production, and it primarily resulted in yield loss,” says Jonathan Whitworth, Ph.D., a research plant pathologist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS). “Since then, we have identified several new strains of PVY in grower fields that are also causing necrosis, which impacts tuber quality as well.”

The good news is that through advancements in technology and global connectivity, researchers and breeders can share information more rapidly, identify potential challenges more quickly, and leverage tools and resources to fight the battle head on. That connectivity is essential to the multi-agency and multi-disciplinary approach needed to control viruses.

Regulators concentrate on containing viruses. Certified seed organizations help ensure a clean start. Entomologists evaluate insect control measures. And breeders focus on developing resistant varieties.

Containing A Virus

Because there is no cure for viruses nor a way to control them once they infect a plant, preventive measures are the best way to reduce viral risk. “The best line of defense against a virus is to keep it out,” Byamukama says. “On a global scale, we do this by ensuring that plant materials being imported from other countries or being transported from one region of the U.S. to another are clean and don’t hide pathogens and arthropods.”

On-farm, commercial growers can minimize the risk of infection by using certified seed. In the case of potatoes, stem cutting and micropropagation techniques, in which plantlets are grown in tissue culture, help obtain pest-free potato plants for propagation and production of certified seed tubers. Several generations of plants are grown in the field to produce certified seed tubers for commercial growers.

“PVY can be highly detrimental to seed growers, as it greatly impacts their ability to sell higher-quality seed,” Whitworth says. “For the commercial grower, the biggest impact is probably yield loss. Our studies have shown that for about every 1% of PVY you have in a commercial crop, you can lose about 1.5 sacks, or 150 pounds, of potatoes. And the quality defects caused by necrosis can result in a lot being rejected by the buyer.”

“Detection and proper diagnosis during the certification process help ensure that seed pieces do not carry viruses into a newly planted commercial field,” Shetty says. “The states in the Pacific Northwest, for instance, work very closely to ensure that seed lots are not infected with potentially damaging viruses like PVY.”

Hygiene is important at the farm level as well. Cleaning equipment before transporting it between fields is an important prevention measure growers can implement to reduce spread.

Controlling the Vector Factor

The next step to protecting commercial crops from viruses is controlling the vectors. In most cases, the vectors that transmit plant viruses from one living plant to another are insects. Though some vectors are more efficient than others, all must be controlled to stop the spread.

''

The neonicotinoid class of chemistry was introduced just before the turn of the century. And since the introduction, there has been a marked reduction of PLRV in potatoes in North America.

Kiran Shetty, Ph.D. Technical Development Lead for Potatoes at Syngenta

Byamukama warns, “By the time you see symptoms in the field, it is too late. Once one plant in the field is infected, you can’t cure it – you can only prevent the virus’s spread to other plants.”

Applications to stop the spread can sometimes start with seed treatments.

For instance, Byamukama says, “Bean leaf beetles, the vector of BPMV, survive the winter as adults and emerge in the spring to feed on seedling plants. A seed treatment insecticide kills the vector upon feeding, which means it will only affect that one plant, if the beetle was already carrying the virus in its body – as opposed to the beetle’s feeding and transmitting the virus to several plants in the same field.”

In potatoes, the use of neonicotinoid insecticides has been instrumental in the control of the aphid species that transmit potato leafroll virus (PLRV). PLRV can cause yield loss and tuber net necrosis, making harvested potatoes unsuitable for fresh market, processing or seed.

“The neonicotinoid class of chemistry was introduced just before the turn of the century,” Shetty says. “And since the introduction, there has been a marked reduction of PLRV in potatoes in North America. Syngenta has been a leader in the development of potato seed treatments containing neonicotinoids that protect young plants from the get-go.”

For viruses that primarily affect plants in early stages of development, producers can adjust planting to avoid times when vectors are active. Vectors will move to other hosts, eliminating concurrency of the crop and vectors in the field.

Breeding for Built-in Protection

In-field measures are the opening act in controlling plant viruses. The endgame is breeding varieties with genetic resistance.

All plants have natural defense mechanisms, including resistance to viruses. Breeders select for these beneficial genetics for built-in protection. “In extension, we like to refer to resistant varieties as the low-hanging fruit,” Byamukama says. “They do not cost much more than susceptible varieties, and, if plants do become infected, they help reduce the severity of symptoms to protect crop yield and quality.”

In the world of produce, quality is of utmost importance and can make or break a crop. Preventing viruses in fruiting vegetable crops, such as tomatoes, is a must due to the market’s strict quality standards.

“When growing fruiting crops, pesticide use is highly restricted once the fruit is developed. “The ability to leverage genetic resistance as a primary solution is critical,” says Gregori Bonnet, Syngenta seeds principal scientist, who leads a team of trait project leads dedicated to developing genetic resistance in fruiting crops.

According to Ruud Kaagman, global crop unit head for tomatoes, Syngenta screens thousands of tomato lines, and wild material, annually to identify those that exhibit natural resistance to viruses.

“Syngenta has a global center of excellence with the resources and knowledge to solve major disease issues,” Kaagman says. “We are able to identify sustainable solutions in addressing potential outbreaks long-term by combining different resistances and resistance mechanisms.”

Tobamoviruses, a diverse group of viruses that caused severe outbreaks in tomatoes in recent years, are a primary focus for Syngenta. Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV), which first emerged in Israel in 2014, has spread to tomato fields and greenhouses across the Middle East, Europe, Mexico, North America and other parts of the world. ToBRFV damages the quality and yield of tomato crops and has forced the temporary shutdown of some major greenhouse operations.

Earlier this year, Syngenta introduced its second beefsteak tomato variety with resistance to ToBRFV and plans to introduce broad resistance into its full portfolio of tomato varieties over the next several years.

In potatoes, the USDA is working closely with industry partners to encourage the adoption of resistant varieties through grower education.

“We have multidisciplinary grants focused on viruses that cause necrotic defects in tubers and have done PVY demonstration plots in Washington, Wisconsin and Maine with as many as 20 varieties, specific to each region,” Whitworth says. “These real-time educational experiences show growers how the virus is expressed in plants and allow us to focus on how resistant varieties, combined with cultural practices, can prevent viral infection and protect crop yield and quality.”

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

1 Pierre Lefeuvre, Darren P. Martin, Santiago F. Elena, Dionne N. Shepherd, Philippe Roumagnac, Arvind Varsani. Evolution and ecology of plant viruses. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2019

2 https://www.soybeanresearchinfo.com/diseases/soybeanviruses.html

by

As we head into a mid-term election year, the policies impacting agriculture are regularly in the headlines.

“Over the last few years, the words ‘farming,’ ‘agriculture’ and ‘rural America’ have been in the national media more so than at any other point in my lifetime,” says Kelsey Barnes, federal government relations manager at Syngenta. “Many U.S. farmers realize now more than ever how regulations and the political environment in Washington, D.C., impact their operations.”

But even with constant media coverage, it’s hard to keep up with the changes.

Keeping Stepped-Up Basis

To the relief of many farmers, stepped-up basis is no longer in imminent danger of elimination. As farms pass from generation to generation, land values tend to increase. With stepped-up basis, farms’ successors only pay capital gains taxes on property value increases since the land was inherited. Without stepped-up basis, they would pay taxes on the full increase in value since the time that the land was originally purchased by a relative.

“Eliminating stepped-up basis would make it nearly impossible for many family farms to continue,” Barnes says. “We hear a lot about protecting small family farms; but without stepped-up basis, many farmers would be forced to sell land in order to pay taxes.”

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) analysis, eliminating stepped-up basis would create a new tax burden for 17% of small farms, 66% of midsized farms, 80% of large farms and 96% of very large farm operations.

''

Eliminating stepped-up basis would make it nearly impossible for many family farms to continue. We hear a lot about protecting small family farms; but without stepped-up basis many farmers would be forced to sell land in order to pay taxes.

Kelsey Barnes Federal Government Relations Manager at Syngenta

Needing Clarity About the Denial Decree

Mexico’s timelines or details around the phasing out of glyphosate are murky after publishing a decree banning its use as well as banning imports of genetically modified (GMO) corn by 2024. Follow-through on this decree could negatively impact American corn growers, as Mexico is a top export market for U.S. corn. Mexico demonstrated a committed anti-GMO stance recently when it rejected a new Bayer stacked corn trait, but a lack of clarity makes it hard for the U.S. agriculture industry to forecast or prepare for the transition.

“While there haven’t been further signals of how the transition will roll out, this development is not a promising sign for any companies, including Syngenta, that have biotech lined up,” Barnes says. “Even worse, if they were to ban all importation of GMO corn, we would likely see a rapid decline in the U.S. corn market, and Mexico would see a rapid increase in food prices.”

Connecting Rural America

In 2020, the Federal Communications Commission found that 18.3 million Americans lack access to broadband internet. Other research organizations put the number closer to 42 million. Rural communities may, however, see improvements soon. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocates $65 billion to broadband infrastructure. Of this, $2 billion of this will go directly to the USDA’s ReConnect Program. This is in addition to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack’s late 2021 announcement opening applications for up to $1.15 billion in loans and grants for expanding the availability of broadband in rural areas through the ReConnect Program.

“This is a significant increase in rural broadband funding and can only positively impact our customers and employees,” Barnes says. “When farmers in rural America have access to quality internet, it’s easier for them to connect to products and resources that benefit their families and farms.”

Making an Impact

Syngenta is committed to advancing policies that improve the lives and operations of U.S. farmers. The Syngenta Corporation Employee Political Action Committee (Syngenta PAC) is an employee-based political action committee committed to taking proactive measures in government affairs. The Syngenta PAC is on the front lines advocating policy outcomes that will favorably impact individuals in the ag industry.

“The Syngenta Corporation Employee Political Action Committee is entirely funded by employees — not Syngenta as a company,” says Barnes. “These are employees who are contributing, because they believe in the importance of supporting policies and members of Congress who support their business interest, the agriculture industry and their growers.”

The Syngenta PAC supports candidates and members of Congress who promote the ag industry’s Freedom to Operate.

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Available information around these policies is rapidly changing. Please note that the information included in this article is reflective of the status as of early December 2021.

by

“We have access to top Syngenta Seedcare™ specialists and scientists who explain how the products benefit growers,” says Kyle McClelland, seed and technical agronomy manager for Brandt. “It’s invaluable for us to have that level of dialogue because we can bring that information to our customers, separating insight and knowledge from the noise in the marketplace, and help them make the right decisions.”

For over a decade, Illinois-based retailer Brandt provided quality Syngenta products to their customers, worked with Syngenta to resolve agronomic issues and built a level of trust that set the stage for an expanded partnership. Now Syngenta supports most of the Brandt seed treatment business. This didn’t happen overnight. The two companies built the decision on a longstanding relationship and their common goal ‒ helping growers succeed.

Fostering Growth

Wade Meteer, sales representative for Syngenta, first performed a needs assessment for Brandt and determined a path forward. The path included a direct line to The Seedcare Institute™, a Syngenta network of facilities that test seed treatment performance in controlled environments to match the needs and requests of customers. The Institute’s U.S. facility, located in Stanton, Minnesota, worked directly with Brandt employees and performed a live demonstration of Syngenta Seedcare formulation technology to answer questions and highlight benefits.

Meteer praises Brandy for its customer focus. “Brandt works in the interest of growers to maximize their potential return on investment. Syngenta resonates with that mindset, and our seed treatment products fit this shared goal,” Meteer says.

McClelland knew he could depend on Meteer and the Syngenta team’s product knowledge and support to help deliver top-notch customer service to growers. Before McClelland moved up to his current role with Brandt, Meteer sometimes accompanied him on calls.

“Our customers trust us to make the right decisions for their farms,” McClelland says. “I think when they rely on us that heavily, it’s helpful that we can rely on the people at Syngenta. It makes for a great partnership from top to bottom.”

Dave Byrum, Syngenta Seedcare specialist and technical resource for Brandt, emphasizes the value of collaboration.

“Wade and those at Brandt have built a rapport and trust with each other, so broadening the Syngenta seed treatment portfolio was a true team effort,” Byrum says.

''

Our customers trust us to make the right decisions for their farms. I think when they rely on us that heavily, it’s helpful that we can rely on the people at Syngenta.

Kyle McClelland Seed and Technical Agronomy Manager at Brandt

Brandt and Syngenta worked together for years bringing crop protection products to farmers, however, developing the seed treatment business was new territory. The longstanding partnership gave McClelland confidence that whatever challenges arose, Syngenta would provide the solutions needed to help keep his customers and their operations profitable.

Meteer says expanding the seed treatment business with Brandt requires frequent conversations re-evaluating the partnership’s objectives. Working together successfully means learning what each company needs and how to achieve their goals.

Building Trust

While mutual company objectives are important, a successful partnership goes beyond aligning business goals. The participants must also build trust among one another. McClelland takes pride in the fact that Brandt is a family-owned business that works with people who also care about their customers.

“When someone has the character, professionalism, knowledge and integrity of Wade Meteer, you do business with that person,” McClelland says.

Meteer emphasizes the role communication plays in his work with Brandt. When a Brandt employee calls him with questions, he’ll either have answers or find someone who does and report back quickly. Syngenta agronomic support teams constantly test and refine product recommendations in local geographies. Meteer says the information those teams provide is crucial in helping him give quick and accurate answers to the questions he receives.

For the past three years, nearly all seed treatment products Brandt has been carrying are from Syngenta. While Syngenta is proud of that achievement, there’s always room for improvement and better understanding.

“Maintaining the partnership requires not losing sight of what got us there. We still do yearly technical update meetings with Brandt from an agronomy and application service standpoint,” Byrum says. “We treat them like the top-shelf customer they are.”

Discovering Superior Performance

The personal bonds between the companies are strong, but Brandt wouldn’t partner with Syngenta if they didn’t provide top-tier products. McClelland is impressed with Syngenta seed treatments’ field performance as well as the convenience from a treatability, stability and packaging standpoint.

CruiserMaxx® Vibrance® insecticide/fungicide seed treatment and Saltro® fungicide seed treatment are two flagship products that drive a high crop response for growers. McClelland says CruiserMaxx Vibrance offers broad-spectrum protection from the major seedling diseases challenging growers in central Illinois. “The ease of use and the treatability of CruiserMaxx Vibrance in my opinion is second to none in the industry,” McClelland says. “And with Saltro, there are fewer agronomic issues, and it’s a no-brainer to use it on the majority of our acres here at Brandt.”

With room to grow, excellent company relationships, and proven product performance, this partnership is poised to provide solutions to farmers’ challenges for many years.

“We follow through on what we promise,” Meteer says, “and that’s what drives this long-term relationship.”

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Cover image: Wade Meteer, sales representative for Syngenta, (left) and Kyle McClelland, seed and technical agronomy manager for Brandt, (right) inspect a flourishing soybean field in Pleasant Plains, Illinois. The crop got an early boost from Saltro fungicide seed treatment and CruiserMaxx Vibrance insecticide/fungicide seed treatment. Photography by Seth Lowe. 

by

Pilot programs give organizations the opportunity to refine their approach, developing models that allow for larger scale impacts. That was the idea behind the BioCarbon Fund, a pilot project the World Bank managed from 2004 to 2020. Public- and private-sector partners worked on the project with smallholder farmers to create accounting methods for greenhouse gas emissions and finance plans incentivizing farmers to use sustainable farming practices. The lessons the partners learned now inform carbon sequestration and carbon-credit efforts across the world, including the U.S.

Emission reductions in agriculture can come from a variety of activities, including reducing emissions from farming itself through steps like the improvement of input-use efficiency or from trapping carbon in the soil by means of conservation agriculture. A farmer earns carbon credits through participation in a voluntary carbon market and meeting carbon-reduction criteria. When these markets’ emitters purchase a farmer’s carbon credits to offset their own emissions, the farmer benefits financially for his or her sustainable farming practices.

''

We believe that if farmers produce societal benefits, they should be rewarded. Carbon credits looked, and still look, like a promising tool to do that.

Dominik Klauser Research and Development Lead Syngenta Foundation

In the BioCarbon Fund program, nongovernmental organizations in Zambia and Kenya facilitated interaction with smallholder farmers. The Syngenta Foundation, which focuses on bringing innovation to smallholders, provided those organizations with agronomic advice and connections to sustainable-farming solutions.

“Incentive systems are largely missing in developing countries,” says Dominik Klauser, research and development lead at the Syngenta Foundation. “We believe that if farmers produce societal benefits, they should be rewarded. Carbon credits looked, and still look, like a promising tool to do that.”

An important lesson learned from the BioCarbon Fund is that financial benefits multiply if program administrators invest in good outreach and input provision systems. For example, farmers’ productivity more than doubled in Kenya through the extension and inputs financed by sales of carbon credits through the BioCarbon Fund.

“Apart from being an investor, our role in the BioCarbon program also included co-creation of the first methodology for issuing carbon credits based on emission reductions from agricultural activities,” Klauser says.

In its ongoing efforts to help smallholder farmers, The Syngenta Foundation is currently working with the One Acre Fund. The program assists more than 1 million farmers in eastern Africa, improving their productivity and livelihoods through the provision of quality inputs — including seed, fertilizer and crop protection products — and extension services.

“The objective is to identify elements of the One Acre Fund’s work that can be used as a basis for partner farmers to obtain carbon payments,” Klauser says. “We have identified several promising areas of intervention. Pilots will take place in Zambia, Tanzania and Rwanda.”

Smallholders in developing countries lack access to many things North American farmers take for granted, says Paul Castle, head of communications at the Syngenta Foundation. “The Syngenta Foundation continues to help smallholders by focusing on insurance, good seed and agricultural services.”

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

by

Ensuring a sustainable food supply requires each of us to play a role in preserving our land and protecting pollinators. Syngenta understands the importance of the interconnectedness of agriculture and nature and is committed to helping biodiversity thrive.

Taking strides toward sustainable agriculture helps promote an industry that can successfully feed today’s consumers while safeguarding pollinators and conserving the environment for generations to come. The Good Growth Plan highlights our ongoing commitments and initiatives to support farmers and the environment through 2025. And, with our Operation Pollinator program, we are focused on creating essential habitats to restore pollinators on agricultural land, on golf courses and within other landscapes.

We invite you to explore our new, interactive biodiversity infographic and resources by visiting www.Syngenta-US.com/Biodiversity. Together, we can help biodiversity flourish and bring plant potential to life.

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES